Samsung GT-P1000 versus Sanei N79 manufactured by AMPERE

21st April 2013

Quadrant Score benchmarking.

  Sanei N79 3G, 1Ghz dual core, 512mb, 4G rom + storage     Samsung GT-P1000, 1Ghz, 512mb, 16G rom + storage
  Total CPU Mem I/O 2D 3D     Total CPU Mem I/O 2D 3D
dual core 1Ghz 2635 5438 1320 4619 509 1288   1.4Ghz 1511 2009 1755 1046 1000 1745
2506 4946 1138 4585 501 1361   1493 2071 1760 1044 1014 1574
2496 5195 1219 4168 509 1388   1490 2131 1741 1065 1006 1606
2489 4968 1220 4435 500 1384   1477 2059 1772 1074 1006 1476
2308 5506 1259 3327 420 1029   1454 1990 1773 1045 998 1472
2291 5204 1089 3569 505 1088   1401 2001 1772 1314 336 1583
2248 5031 1081 3665 485 977   1349 2005 1751 1033 333 1622
2210 4618 1249 3282 585 1315   1346 1998 1730 1120 317 1566
1986 4654 1021 3133 394 729   1312 1596 1665 903 990 1405
1765 4972 1119 1336 629 770   1Ghz 1193 1427 1721 981 333 1502
1698 4545 1099 1562 689 596   1167 1416 1757 868 285 1510
1674 4061 1020 2006 400 879   1163 1415 1751 892 314 1445
1673 4061 1020 2006 420 879                
1370 4032 623 1259 467 467                
1307 3745 655 1413 325 399                

The N79 scores average 2400, versus P1000 1400 using overclocked CPU to 1.4Ghz.

Take a closer look, N79 fluctuates in performance as high as 2635 down to 1307. 100% difference. While the P1000 is extremely consistent. A mere 1511 versus 1312, keeping same CPU speed in mind. 10% difference, much more acceptable.

N79 CPU beats the crap out of P1000, but so what? it's lousy software implementation LAGs so much, display hangs so long time, apps close and reopens, i.e. keyboard pops up and down and ups and down, typed words get lost and retype and lost, so frustrating.

Memory speed on P1000 is much higher by 40% and again the consistency is so good, while N79 cannot hold it's ground, dropping as low as 623.

Input/Output is worst on N79 from 4619 to 1259. Again the P1000 although lower, but super consistent from 1074 to 903, within 10% torelance. A fluke 1314 was registered.

Then this is the IMPORTANT part. 2 DIMENSION graphics. consistent 300 or 1000. Why the sudden gap? 300 is the standard score, while 1000 is "enforce GPU rendering for all 2D". This worked on the P1000 by rom, but it obviously didn't work on the N79. Again software development is BAD.

Finally 3D, a 400% fluctuation from N79 from 1388 to 399. This is just so bad. While surprisingly the P1000's 3D lowest score is 1405, higher than N79 highest. Then P1000's highest is 1745. WoW.

 

Highest total scores, P1000 versus N79. Then lowest total scores.

 

Then lowest total scores. P1000 left using 1Ghz, N79 right.

  versus 

Notice N79, nearly 50% of the score is CPU alone, while other support are nearly dead. While P1000 is spread evenly, no wonder it runs smooth.

  1. Samsung GT-P1000 vs. Sanei N79
  2. Samsung GT-P1000 vs. Sanei N79 Quadrant Scores
  3. Samsung GT-P1000 vs. Sanei N79 Quadrant 2D
  4. Samsung GT-P1000 vs. Sanei N79 Tips to fast
  5. Samsung GT-P1000 vs. Sanei N79 Camera
  6. Sanei N79 more info

 

ACOUSTICS SECTION             AUDIO SECTION             CAR SECTION

HOME - Technical Website for Acoustics, Audio and Car

  Malaysia Boleh 

Hit Counter